The audit asks who approved it. Your answer is a screenshot of a ticket.
Your change process is real work that produces no durable evidence. Move approval, exposure and rollback into the release itself, and the record exists because the change happened, not because somebody documented it.
Creating an account with Google shares your name, email address and profile picture with us, so we can identify you and contact you about your account. Our stated retention period is the life of the account plus 30 days after you close it.
The process is real. The evidence is improvised.
You genuinely do review changes. What you do not have is anything an external auditor can read without an engineer sitting next to them explaining it.
Evidence is assembled after the fact
Before the audit, someone spends a week collecting tickets, screenshots and chat exports into a document. That document is a reconstruction, and everyone involved knows it.
Approval and deployment are unrelated systems
The ticket says the change was approved. Nothing connects that approval to the configuration that actually reached production, so the two are linked by convention.
Reproducing a decision is a research project
Asked what the system was doing on a specific date for a specific customer, you can usually find out. It takes days, and the answer comes with caveats.
What the next audit looks like
The same controls, producing evidence as a side effect of doing the work.
Approval gates the change itself
The required permission is enforced on the action, not on a ticket that describes the action. An unapproved change does not reach an environment.
Every actor and version is recorded as it happens
Who changed what, which configuration version was live, and which automated action fired. Written at the time, not reconstructed later.
Scoped credentials, minimal exposure
Service credentials are scoped per environment, so what a system can read or change is a property of the credential rather than a promise in a policy document.
How it works
Put the controls where the change happens
Role-based permissions and approvals apply to flag and rollout actions directly, so the control cannot be bypassed by doing the work somewhere else.
Version the configuration
Published configuration is versioned and immutable, so the question of what was live at a given moment has one answer.
Record automated actions too
A guardrail that pauses or reverts a rollout writes the same kind of record a person would. Automation does not create a gap in the trail.
Stop assembling evidence the week before the audit
Fifteen minutes from signup to an approval-gated change with a recorded trail.
Start on GrowthCreating an account with Google shares your name, email address and profile picture with us, so we can identify you and contact you about your account. Our stated retention period is the life of the account plus 30 days after you close it.
Approvals, audit trail and scoped credentials included. SSO and SCIM available on Enterprise.